Pretty in Pink– Just Need More Of It
February 28, 2009 by MInTheGap
Filed under Female, Quick Review
Visited 644 times, 1 so far today
Is This Modest?
MInTheGap: This is the other problem with laying down poses. As you can see– or perhaps not see– when you prop your head up, gravity effects your top so that there’s a hole that you can see down. That might not make the outfit immodest, but you’re definitely in an immodest pose.
Foy: Her arms are placed very strategically. I’m afraid that if she moved them, not only would you see a massive amount of cleavage, but also possibly a tease at *more*. Not to mention the fact that the skirt looks a bit too short.
Your Turn…
[ratings]
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d5dc920d-7a63-4390-b088-75490bf5d422)
Loading ...
This shirt is so immodest I’m amazed she’s not having a wardrobe malfunction. Judging by the lines of the shirt that I can see, it goes down way beyond the line of decency.
However, her expression does not seem seductive at all. Is anyone else getting the innocence vibe?
On the shorts, they’re plenty long enough. You have to consider the position she’s in- her knees are on the ground and there’s at least 2 or 3 inches sticking up from the ground (that’s a hem, not her backside, you can tell if you look closely), so she’s got on almost capri-length shorts.
Ahem. Thankfully her arms are there is all I can say! :-)
And I agree with Anna, her expression seems innocent enough and her shorts are nice and long.
arielles last blog post..Poll Results =)
If it weren’t for the neckline of her shirt, I think I might go mostly modest here, but as it is, I’m afraid I must say immodest.